Does your hair style affect your job prospects?
Submitted by John Milburn CMgr MCMI on Fri, 03/09/2010 - 08:26
I heard an interesting debate earlier on this week about how people's hairstyle impacted on their job search. The general debate centred around people who had changed their hair to fit in with their working environment and those who said that their hair style was part of their character and they would rather not work somewhere that did not accept them as they were.
So, if you're qualifed for a job does your appearance or hairstyle really matter?
Not sure what style to go for...
I think a nice mullet would suit you Jim. You could pass yourself off as an old style Andre Agassi :)
I'd imagine if it was particularly radical it might do, like if you had green hair or something, but surely recruiters aren't that shallow that they'd reject someone over a haircut?
I saw a young lady on the underground once with a VERY rude word shaved into the side of her head....I'm not sure she would have been first on many people's list for a customer facing role!
However, I guess it depends on the role you are going for, and what is deemed as appropriate appearance-wise. If the job was fronting a punk band- she'd probably be perfect!
I think it probably depends on the organisation, it's culture and the role you're applying for.
I don't want to use sweeping generalisations but you're probably not likely to get very far in a law firm if you have unruly, dyed hair. I don't think this is recruiters being shallow I think it's them think about their business and clients and the need to have employees who portray a professional image that matches the environment they're working in.
One of my friends thinks he missed out on a couple of jobs because of his dreadlocks – though obviously hard to prove.
It was their loss; he is a very clever guy. He now works at CERN in Switzerland trying to figure out the origins of the Universe. Silly thing is he cut them off about 2 months into that job anyway!
Hello, I used to think that employing a certain 'profile' to fit the relevancy of what the organisation does was important. I certainly applied this logic myself having interviewed and recruited many dozens of individuals over the years.
However I have discovered and am still discovering that this is not necessarily the best approach. The world has clearly changed from when I started working. I work in a financial services corporate environment that, although the men don't wear ties and the women standard matching business suits, still presents the dress code as semi formal (so men wear open neck formal shirts). However as the business has expanded to include not only asset management but operations, the profile of the candidate has changed and with that in came purple and other stark coloured hair, hair not combed but scrunched up in a comb, mini skirts, high heeled shoes and outrageous fish net stockings, scruffy appearances, men with long hair et al. Some of the change I can live with, some I still struggle with (like unwashed hair - days worth!). But as a senior manager I try to look through all of that to the role and the competencies and skills required to do the job. Naomi is perfectly correct to say that for client facing roles I would probably continue to be more selective.
I have a friend who has worked in a high street store for 5 years and has been waiting over 2 years for a place on the companys management programme, having been nominated by his bosses. He puts in all the extra hours, does all the training courses, has worked up the ranks, etc only to find newer, less experienced people overtaking him. He isnt totally scruffy but doesnt put so much effort into his appearence on a daily basis as he feels it is less important and he is a hardworker and will be rewarded on his merits, yet he is finding those overtaking him do, shall we say, fit the image better.
It just depends on the type of role you are looking for. In this case the company require a manager who reflects a professional image to its customers.
I believe how we dress and look at work is important. It has been my experience in an industrial environment that those people who make the effort to dress appropriately also deliver the tidiest work. From the office perspective there have been huge changes over the years. Dress is more casual and when it is not customer facing not a problem. I suppose a question is, do we want to go back to the corporate uniforms?I agree that we could ignore and miss out on some talent due to how they dress. Another way to look at this is, we could loose business because of how they dress.Nicola, agree your last statement,
People will always make judgements on a first impression - its human nature. My feeling is as long as someone is dressed appropriately for the environment and role they are carrying out I don't have a problem. However I would prefer not to see the top of someone's underwear whenever they sit down.
A student that worked for me one Summer (he was quite good for the most part) now has a mohican. I feel quite certain that this has been a hindrance to him trying to get work, although he has succeeded in doing so - first for a well-known High Street food outlet where he dealt with people face to face, and more latterly for a hosting company (where he assists on the phone, so no face-to-face issues there).
Paul
Interesting article in the Metro this morning about a woman who was told by a Job Centre advisor she wouldn't get a job because of her tatoos and piercings. She was told the only place she might get work was in a tatoo parlour!
However this doesn't seem to be the main reason why employers are turned off from hiring potential recruits. A survey by Reabur.com states that top of the list is poor personal hygiene. The research states that other reasons for not employing someone are:
So it seems that our appearance, body language and speech are all important when seeking employment. But didn't we already know that?
The boss at Stena was talking recently about how many of their British staff were fat with tattoos, so whilst it doesn't seem to have hampered their attempts at finding work at the company it perhaps hasn't held them in particularly high esteem there!
He is now saying his comments were taken out of context and that they work really hard. so now they are hard working tattooed faties