Apprentices could be exploited due to lack of scrutiny, says Royal Mail manager

Publicly-funded apprenticeship schemes are not being scrutinised on a regular basis and it could lead to youngsters being exploited, a Royal Mail HR manager has claimed.

The manager told People Management that as companies try to save money in the recession, there is scope for them to overload their apprentices with work that fully-trained staff should be doing.

Cheryl Simons, an accreditation, funding and advisory manager, said that because Ofsted inspections are only carried out once every four years, there is a large window for potential abuse to take place.

"It won't happen with us, because we take our apprentices on full time and they're not given a reduced wage. But it certainly could be an issue out there in the wider world", Ms Simons said.

Ms Simons was scathing of the way Ofsted operates, saying it does not monitor where money is spent, and companies can easily hide things from them. She added: "A lot of it [money] is given to private training providers, which is where a lot of the problems really lie."

The criticism, Ms Simons says, is because she believes the government has greater responsibility as there is taxpayers' money involved.

The news comes as serious doubts are raised about the future government funding of skills and apprenticeship training programmes following the slashing of the budget for the Learning and Skills Council's redevelopment programme earlier in the year.

Comments

Its actually true that young people do get 'exploited' through training schemes - but this is accepted to an extent - even by the recruits themselves. Especially when job fears are running high - youngsters are happy just to be in work.

I know a girl who left school at 16 because study was not for her - she just wasn't interested. She went on a YTS programme with a major company and did very well.

They paid her a pittance really but she accepted it. They kept her for 18 months after which time they wouldn't keep her on as she was too expensive even though she was considered a very valuable member of the team and excellent in her job. They wanted to replace her with a new YTS person for which they would get funding.

She got her NVQ from them, eventually, but she had to chase them for the meetings and assessments and the actual certificate at the end.

Fortunately she walked into a job as a junior in an accountancy firm in central london and hasn't looked back since.

In the long term she is probably better off as a result of the YTS as she may not have got the junior job if she hadn't been able to go to the interview and show that she had done all of the tasks that her job entailed.