Management skills of equalities commission called into question
Trevor Phillips, the head of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), is facing mounting pressure to resign his post.
The chairman's management style is under fire while the commission has been criticised by the public spending watchdog for re-employing senior staff after giving them generous early severance packages.
However, despite the increasing pressure on him to step down, his supporters have rallied to back his management style.
Six commissioners have left the body in the past four months, increasing the pressure on chairman Phillips, and MPs are set to put the running of the commission under closer scrutiny.
But supporters of Mr Phillips say he is not going to resign.
Mr Phillips was appointed to a second term as commission chairman this month and still has the backing of ministers.
However, a series of resignations of senior officials and reports of internal splits have raised question marks about how the organisation is being managed.
According to its website, the EHRC strategy is driven by its vision of a better Britain built on principles of fairness and respect, its statutory duty to eradicate discrimination, and the needs of the society in which it operates.
Comments
This all seems rather strange as it was only a few months ago that everything seemed to be fine and the commission was being widely praised. Must be more to the story than so far disclosed.
I am sure that is always the case Vince. Mind you, sometimes things are allowed to simmer quietly when people are expecting change - no point rocking the boat too much publicly if you have made your feelings clear and are expecting the man to go!
I saw him speak at one of the OU's 40th anniversary lectures a few weeks back.
He made an observation that he saw speaking English as important and that things such as the translation into other languages of all the government leaflets etc should only be transitionary and be phased out at some stage. Would have loved to have got the chance to ask him which set of new immigrants would lose the transitional help. Not because I necessarily agree with having them but just the principle that if the commission supported it in the first place because it helps new immigrants which batch do they feel should be the first to lose out?