The Apprentice – would you make the grade?

There are many fans of The Apprentice, including myself and some of the trainees on one of our recent Leadership Development Programmes.  Whilst covering the subject of Project Management, I asked the trainees to watch that night’s Apprentice repeat (thank you BBC!!) as homework.

Each trainee drew the name of an Apprentice out of the hat in readiness, and was asked to analyse the performance of that individual, both as part of The Apprentice project team, and against their own organisation’s leadership competencies. They were asked to consider what their Apprentice did particularly well, and where they thought they could use some development.  

The resulting discussion was fascinating – allowing us to uncover different understandings of what a project leader’s responsibilities were, and the differing interpretations of what were accepted as ‘standard’ competencies within their own business. The real value in terms of leadership reflection came when we started to uncover how different trainees valued (or not) different skill sets or behaviours.

This led us to ponder the question of ‘would we make the grade?’ and the answer was “we’re not really sure what the grade is!”

Whether you agree with Sir Alan Sugar’s methods, or consider it all to be a performance for the cameras, if you are interested in developing in your career as a manager, it is worth considering the key questions:-

  1. Do you know what ‘the grade’ is in the eyes of your organisation? and
  2. Do you make the grade?

This is a guest post by Deborah Willis, from the Centre for People Development, a CMI approved centre.

Comments

It's a very good question. I know in my job I have KPI's set for me that I'm expected to meet over the year so in that sense it's very clear whether I 'make the grade' or not. It certainly helps as well. Have to admit though at various other jobs I've had nothing to go on and it does make it very hard.

According to the runner-up, Kate Walsh, Sir Alan Sugar wanted to hire her too but BBC red tape wouldn't let him. Those nasty bureaucrats.

In the post-final review show, 'You're Fired', Adrian Chiles interviewed Sir Alan about his decision, and about his thoughts on Kate. Now I don't recall his exact words, but they were something like this:

'Kate will be fine, I have no concerns about Kate, and I've given her my private email address and my phone number and told her that she can call me 24/7 if she needs any advice'

24/7? How nice for her. Honestly, Sir Alan, if you do want to give out your private contact details to young girls, don't announce the fact on live national TV.

And don't forget that Kate had a brief romance with one of the other contestants, just to make sure that she was the cat amongst the pigeons in the penthouse.

As Adrian Chiles says in his blog, "she wasn't mourning for him once he'd left, was she?".

So what does Kate get out of being runner-up? Maximum publicity, Sir Alan Sugar's private email address and of course she doesn't actually have to work for him (as the winner does). All of the benefits of being on the show with none of the downsides.

I'm not saying she threw it, just that every cloud has a sugared lining.

Wow, that is a cynical view of things!

Every cloud has a sugared lining, haha.

Its so true though - the person who comes second certainly ends up better off than the 1st place contestant, who actually has to work for the man at the end of the day ;P