The case for swingeing changes to email practices

Email practises need to change radically in order to improve both efficiency and communication. Bloated inboxes and managers spending 90% of their time in Outlook are symptoms of how this modern form of communication is holding back organisations.
Due to the nature of this communication method it is also a distraction that prevents us from doing what is most important.
In 2004, Steve Robbins wrote a great article entitled Tips for Mastering Email Overload. The key point of this is that the recipient now bears the burden of the email.
E-mail bludgeoned that system in no time. With free sending to an infinite number of people now a reality, every little thought and impulse becomes instant communication. Our most pathetic meanderings become deep thoughts that we happily blast to six dozen colleagues who surely can't wait. On the receiving end, we collect these gems of wisdom from the dozens around us. The result: Inbox overload.
("But my incoming e-mail is important," you cry. Don't fool yourself. Time how long you spend at your inbox. Multiply by your per-minute wage(*) to find out just how much money you spend on e-mail. If you can justify that expense, far out—you're one of the lucky ones. But for many, incoming e-mail is a money suck. Bonus challenge: do this calculation companywide.)
(*) Divide your yearly salary by 120,000 to get your per-minute wage.
Taming e-mail means training the senders to put the burden of quality back on themselves
Managers need to lead the change
The onus to lead this change fall on us in the management profession. Training, support and praise are needed in order for us to improve outbound communication and minimise the impact of inbound communication.
Step 1: Be email efficient
Management is leadership so lead from the front.
When communicating with colleagues send well thought out emails, that are structured and formatted for the benefit of the reader. Subject lines should convey the context of the email to assist the reader in choosing when to read it.
Close all emails with a summary of what actions need to be taken by whom. This assists in clarifying what you expect of the reader and leaves no room for ambiguity.
Practice good inbox efficiency. Close Outlook for 2 hours at a time and work through your todo list. You'll find this an amazing way to maintain focus.
One thing I've done in the past is to create an automatic Wizard/Filter that marks all email that I've been CC'd on as read and then moves it to a seperate folder (unless it has an urgent flag against it). This simple filter saved me hours in reading unnecessary email.
Step 2: Hold training on email efficiency
In a team meeting or specific team meeting hold training on email efficiency. Evangelise about the increase in productivity that can be achieved through better inbox management.
The session should be very interactive and you should work with your team to create a charter of email efficiency that everyone buys in to.
Some of the points to cover are what a good email looks like, subject line writing, and inbox management.
Ideally you should learn more in this session than you teach.
Step 3: Praise and follow up
Let team members know when they've send a good email. It doesn't need to a huge celebration, a simple "thanks for the email, I found it really easy to understand" will suffice.
In your next team meetings review the charter at regular intervals. Is it working? Are we becoming more efficient? How can we get others to follow suit?
Summary, your email tips
It's my hope that we as managers can spend more time on what matters most, creating value for our organisations and security for our teams. Email can be a huge distraction to achieving these goals. Let's fight back and improve the way we work.
Share your tips and comments about email productivity in the comments below.
About David Sealey
David is a Technical Strategy Consultant for Capgemini and an MBA student at the University of Sheffield. David also founded the Executive Book Readers Club which CMI members are free to join.
Photo credit to Amy McTigue
Comments
I agree that the flood of emails you can get are a real drain on productivity. Some nice tips there on how to counter that, thanks.
It's amazing how much time sifting emails takes so it's great to have some practical tips on how to manage them.
I can't help feeling though that email is being used more and more by people to cover their backsides. How many times have you been told when you asked a question "Well it was in the email I sent." or "Well you should have raised that when I emailed you." I believe that the overuse of email goes hand in hand with individuals reluctance to take decisions and take responsibilty for their actions.
While I agree in principle with the points above, can I make a couple of comments with my project manager's hat on?
How often have you had a "yes you did" "no I didn't" conversation when you ask someone how they are getting on with that task you gave them, and the time scale they agreed to deliver it? Getting it into an e-mail provides hard evidence or at the very least gives them an opportunity to say "I don't agree" rather than wait till the day before the deadline to discover it hasn't been done...
On the suggestion of the filter that automatically marks an email as read, I think this could be very dangerous. In projects there can be many occasions where you are not being asked to do something yourself (hence you're in the 'cc' line rather than the 'to' line) but where you need to know what is happening, eg dependent projects in the same overall programme.
@Jim Vasey
Good points from a project manager's point of view:
An email does provide hard evidence of what's been agreed and we're right to use them.
I absolutely agree with using emails in this way. What I think we should be pressing for is better standards of email communication.
I've seen project updates that are three screen lengths long with multiple questions per paragraph. A better way would be to seperate each section with a short heading to give the section context and then list all of the questions clearly.
An even better way is to suggest an answer to the question and ask if the recipient agrees. Once again we've simplified life for the reader.
I didn't make it clear in this part of my post that I would check this folder daily. If I'm CC'd on something it typically isn't urgent and can therefore wait until a point in the day when I'm ready to read them and get up to speed.
You could also set the filter/wizard to not move messages from specific people (e.g. your boss) to ensure that those messages are prioritised.
The rules are different for everyone which is why a team charter should be drawn up to ensure that what is proposed works.
Great comments so far. Thanks to everyone for making my first post here a positive one.
David