From apprenticeships and qualifications to professional development and employability skills. Supporting learners, partners, and centres with tools to deliver, assess, and grow.
Join a professional community committed to excellence in management and leadership. Access exclusive resources, and recognition pathways including Chartered Manager.
Connect, celebrate, and lead with CMI’s vibrant community. From events and awards to networks and campaigns, get involved and help shape the future of management.
Stay informed with expert insights, thought leadership, and the latest in management. From in-depth features to practical guidance, explore the ideas shaping today’s workplace.
Learn about CMI’s mission, values, and impact. From our Royal Charter to governance, careers, and sustainability commitments, discover who we are and what drives us.
30 December 2015 -
The insurance industry isn’t known for its innovation and adapting to changing customer and competitor landscapes. But as competition has intensified, and many insurers struggle to find profits in a price-driven world, companies have had to find ways to reduce costs and improve service.
With a background as a mining engineer with the British Coal Corporation, Ageas’s claims director, Rob Smale, is not your typical insurance director. But in recent years he’s transformed the claims teams and services at Ageas – the 5,500-employee non-life insurer that has eight million policyholders on its books.
Here are his reflections from the frontline of change.
“The concept behind the change to the insurance claims handling team was born of my engineering background and obsession with having the right process. In other companies I’d worked for there were members of staff who were trapped in a broken process. They were not satisfied themselves and also not able to satisfy the customers in a way they wanted to.
“They either had to subvert the system or submit to the system – and both are equally damaging.
“When I came to Ageas I wanted to introduce a focus on getting the people who use the system and the process to design it themselves, based on the feedback they received from the customer. It was definitely a bottom-up approach rather than a top down process.
“I wanted to make sure we had satisfied staff and customers who we retained, and at the same time reduce the cost of processing and settling the claim.
“The approach I took to implementation was to try to think systemically. Rather than taking each piece in turn, it was recognising the whole thing was a system and every part of that was linked. By and large, the claims handlers working on the frontline welcomed the change.
“They recognised that it would make life easier for them, and also felt they would then be doing good for customers and giving them what they wanted. As a result, their satisfaction levels improved.
“The biggest hurdle I had to overcome was from the leadership fraternity. Convincing my immediate boss that I wasn’t a complete madman and that what I was trying to do was going to work was a challenge. We justified some of the crazy things we were doing by showing how similar processes had been used in other industries.
“As well as looking into academic research, I also took inspiration from my background in mining and, particularly, from a visit to the Jaguar factory in Browns Lane in 2002. In essence, what I took from that visit was how the production line was organised by customer, not by type of car. From this I developed the concept of ‘manufacturing’ claims to the bespoke needs of each customer and not assuming all motor claims or home claims are the same.
“Being able to cite the Jaguar process improvements also proved that some very clever people had researched these methods and that the change had been thought through and we hadn’t just come up with it on a whim.
“Another challenge was convincing the team leader population, as they were going to be asked to do their jobs very differently as a result of the new process. We were scrapping targets and KPIs, so managing people was going to be very different. The role of the manager was now to facilitate people achieving success and to look for improvements and ways to do things better, rather than setting targets.
“The first thing we did to get buy-in from the managers was to get them all together, which in Ageas was quite novel – it hadn’t happened in the claims department before – and I explained what it was I was trying to achieve and how we would go about it.
“It was then three years of gradually drip-feeding the phased implementation to the team to make sure they understood each step in the process thoroughly – it was a while before I revealed the end game to them in full.”
› The persistence of presenteeism and other nuanced nonsense
› A new age of vulnerability: why inclusive leadership matters more than ever
› Ask yourself: "How do I make my employees feel?"
› Finance and the Diversity Dividend
For more information or to request interviews, contact CMI's Press Team on 020 7421 2705 or email press.office@managers.org.uk
› The 5 Greatest Examples of Change Management in Business History
› Four companies that failed spectacularly, and the lessons of their premature demise
› 6 companies that get employee engagement – and what they do right
› 4 Signs That Racism May Be An Issue In Your Workplace
› How to build an Effective Team: focus on just 3 things