From apprenticeships and qualifications to professional development and employability skills. Supporting learners, partners, and centres with tools to deliver, assess, and grow.
Join a professional community committed to excellence in management and leadership. Access exclusive resources, and recognition pathways including Chartered Manager.
Connect, celebrate, and lead with CMI’s vibrant community. From events and awards to networks and campaigns, get involved and help shape the future of management.
Stay informed with expert insights, thought leadership, and the latest in management. From in-depth features to practical guidance, explore the ideas shaping today’s workplace.
Learn about CMI’s mission, values, and impact. From our Royal Charter to governance, careers, and sustainability commitments, discover who we are and what drives us.
30 June 2015 -
Matt Scott
Almost two-thirds of time spent in meetings is wasted and non-beneficial, new research has revealed.
At a time when Britain is struggling with poor productivity and many organisations claim that they’re reeling from efficiency cuts, these findings are bound to be a concern for managers trying to turn the tide.
Carried out by executive leadership coaches That People Thing, the nationwide study of 668 senior staffers found that, on average, just 44% of meeting time is believed to be valuable to the company, while as little as 36% is deemed beneficial to managers’ own roles within the company.
“Bad meetings are killing businesses,” said Blaire Palmer, That People Thing chief executive. “Meetings should be where key decisions are taken, where sales targets and figures are discussed and where the agenda is set.
“The research, however, shows they are a huge waste of valuable resources, tying up the time of key people responsible for the success of businesses in meetings where too much of the time they are achieving nothing.”
The biggest reason for meetings failing was that they are too long, with 56% of respondents citing this as the main problem.
Colleagues not being prepared, as well as people veering off topic and not being organised enough were also highlighted as a problem by 43% of those surveyed.
This means that meetings are not just overtly long and irrelevant, they are also overstaffed – a further drain on a company’s productivity.
Disengaged attendees are filling the void in some amusing ways, the research revealed…
Daydreaming – 35%
Doodling – 27%
Planning evening meal – 10%
Browsing dating sites – 1%
Looking for a new job – 1%
A clear agenda and stimulating discussion emerged as the key to a good meeting, with 59% of respondents saying a meeting that makes clear decisions is valuable, and 46% welcoming vigorous debate and discussion.
Palmer added: “Well-run meetings can create a positive ripple throughout the culture of a business. Companies that address what’s going wrong in their meetings can see real benefits.”
To find out how even small changes in your company’s behaviour can have a significant impact, sign up to this CMI short course.
And don’t forget: CMI and Professional Manager is offering a wonderful free trip to Dubai to one lucky reader. Just share your top tips on improving your personal and organisational productivity.
› The persistence of presenteeism and other nuanced nonsense
› A new age of vulnerability: why inclusive leadership matters more than ever
› Ask yourself: "How do I make my employees feel?"
› Finance and the Diversity Dividend
For more information or to request interviews, contact CMI's Press Team on 020 7421 2705 or email press.office@managers.org.uk
› The 5 Greatest Examples of Change Management in Business History
› Four companies that failed spectacularly, and the lessons of their premature demise
› 6 companies that get employee engagement – and what they do right
› 4 Signs That Racism May Be An Issue In Your Workplace
› How to build an Effective Team: focus on just 3 things