From apprenticeships and qualifications to professional development and employability skills. Supporting learners, partners, and centres with tools to deliver, assess, and grow.
Join a professional community committed to excellence in management and leadership. Access exclusive resources, and recognition pathways including Chartered Manager.
Connect, celebrate, and lead with CMI’s vibrant community. From events and awards to networks and campaigns, get involved and help shape the future of management.
Stay informed with expert insights, thought leadership, and the latest in management. From in-depth features to practical guidance, explore the ideas shaping today’s workplace.
Learn about CMI’s mission, values, and impact. From our Royal Charter to governance, careers, and sustainability commitments, discover who we are and what drives us.
14 February 2017 -
We waste countless hours on pointless meetings. Indeed, a survey by Officebroker found that the average UK office worker loses a whole year to meetings throughout their career. And, as Jason Fried and David Heinemeier Hansson, founders of digital agency 37 signals, say: “Every minute you avoid spending in a meeting is a minute you can get real work done instead.”
So how can we hold more efficient get-togethers? During a recent GoToMeeting/CMI webinar, I offered a few ideas for the future of meetings. One of the ideas I floated was banning smartphones and laptops from the meeting room. Reactions were mixed – here’s a sample.
“Banning devices ensures 100% focus.”
“Devices are a distraction. Too many people use them as a comfort blanket.”
“Phones should be banned – they’re disrespectful and distracting – but laptops for presentations are virtually essential these days.”
“What you think of people is how you treat them... Ignoring someone talking is demotivating.”
“You are simply being disrespectful.”
“We’re in a technical industry so we need access to drawings, etc.”
“I take notes on my device. Do I want to duplicate effort by making paper notes?!”
“You need them if you’re presenting evidence to support discussion.”
“We have lots happening in real time; devices help us to get the latest intelligence, and we are also trying to go paperless.”
“It could be a meeting about social media, so we need to see how certain content translates to smartphones and laptops.”
“A phone could be needed for emergency purposes – a child taken ill at school, say. Banning phones doesn’t work for people who have commitments outside of work.”
“Laptops can allow problems to be solved in the meeting, preventing delay.”
“Devices allow people to check their availability when future dates are discussed.”
“For organisational or process-driven meetings, yes, ban them. It will remove a distraction. For meetings relying on the creative spark, no, allow devices.”
“In some circumstances, it’s suitable to ban laptops and smartphones to encourage proper human engagement.”
“Devices should be used only if their use is related to the meeting, not for checking emails.”
“Sometimes my meetings may include people who have to react immediately to outside events. I usually ask people to leave their phones etc on the table (muted) and, if they need to use them, to excuse themselves appropriately. Most of my group know I expect attention and are respectful enough to oblige without reminders.”
“There is a difference between checking for messages on your devices and using them to support the meeting.”
“If meetings are longer than an hour, it’s unfair on people to ban devices due to their other duties. If a meeting is an hour or less, there’s a good chance that people will be fully devoted to the meeting and won’t use devices anyway.”
“Allow them if a consistent approach is applied – ie, all attendees have laptops – and it is established that this is not an opportunity to clear emails.”
“Perhaps there’s a compromise to be made: a partial ban or making a charitable donation if a phone goes off. Computers should be allowed if they are declared at the start.”
“We use devices to facilitate paperless meetings but, yes, there are benefits to banning them – for example, improved concentration.”
Gihan Perera is a business futurist, speaker and author
› The persistence of presenteeism and other nuanced nonsense
› A new age of vulnerability: why inclusive leadership matters more than ever
› Ask yourself: "How do I make my employees feel?"
› Finance and the Diversity Dividend
For more information or to request interviews, contact CMI's Press Team on 020 7421 2705 or email press.office@managers.org.uk
› The 5 Greatest Examples of Change Management in Business History
› Four companies that failed spectacularly, and the lessons of their premature demise
› 6 companies that get employee engagement – and what they do right
› 4 Signs That Racism May Be An Issue In Your Workplace
› How to build an Effective Team: focus on just 3 things