From apprenticeships and qualifications to professional development and employability skills. Supporting learners, partners, and centres with tools to deliver, assess, and grow.
Join a professional community committed to excellence in management and leadership. Access exclusive resources, and recognition pathways including Chartered Manager.
Connect, celebrate, and lead with CMI’s vibrant community. From events and awards to networks and campaigns, get involved and help shape the future of management.
Stay informed with expert insights, thought leadership, and the latest in management. From in-depth features to practical guidance, explore the ideas shaping today’s workplace.
Learn about CMI’s mission, values, and impact. From our Royal Charter to governance, careers, and sustainability commitments, discover who we are and what drives us.
15 November 2017 -
Guest blogger Adrian Furnham
In the nature versus nurture debate of effective leadership, behavioural genetics points to the influence of both biology and environment on human development. The dispute is about the numbers (percentage attributed to each) and the process or mechanisms.
Arguably, it is the ‘made’ bit that is particularly interesting. Both academia and business question what makes a person want to have, as well as succeed in, a leadership role:
Psychobiographers have looked at all sorts of factors to explain the success and failure of prominent people. Some have argued that early, unspecified crises can indelibly imprint children with unusual resolve, as well as drive and risk-taking propensity.
In a theory about leaders, William Therival wrote a paper with the memorable title: Why Mozart and not Salieri? His thesis, backed up by considerable scholarship, was that recovering from major adversity was a factor in the emergence of genius. He developed GAM theory: ‘G’ stands for genetic endowment, ‘A’ for assistances of youth, ‘M’ for misfortunes of youth.
The theory states need to have talent (genetic endowment) in order to succeed: Amen.If you then experience some childhood trauma (M) and are significantly helped through this time (A), your achievements might be even higher.
Mozart, he argues was rich in G, in A, and in M, and that this condition leads to the challenged personality, high in creativity. Fellow composer, Salieri, although high in M, was short in A. This combination is associated with a different personality, that is low in sustained creativity.
Famous high-achievers who have overcome adversity
Researchers cite famous intellectuals who have recovered from, serious ‘misfortunes’ of youth. Many have experienced bereavement of a parent, sibling or child: Tchaikovsky, Sartre, Dali (pictured), van Gogh, Beethoven.
Other high-achievers have suffered parental cruelty, such as Chekhov, Robert Maxwell, Dickens, Gore Vidal. A few recorded physical and social isolation, notably Joseph Conrad and Einstein. Others experienced a lack of fixed abode: Orwell, Kipling, Balzac.
Early traumatic experiences can make or break you. The child who has been parachuted into half a dozen schools learns to cope: to make friends, to join groups, to blend in. Boarding school children are frequently shown to learn self-sufficiency, as does the foreign student who has to adapt to new ideas, customs, language and food.
Meanwhile, isolation can prompt children to begin reading prolifically. If you have been through the “dark night of the soul” as a child and survived, it can put everything into perspective.
When predicting leadership traits, adversity might explain how some can face a hostile board or angry group of shareholders with calmness and reason. Similarly, how prime ministers can face Question Time in the House of Commons or the Paxman-style interview.
There is no reason to seek out trouble. It has been suggested that, whilst sending children as young as six years-old to boarding school toughens them up and enable them to thrive in the cut and thrust of professional life, it may repress them emotionally all their lives.
Long-term relationship problems can be attributed to early isolation and loneliness.
Chronic emotional problems, such as anxiety, depression, resentment and jealousy, can also be traced back to early bad experiences. Family problems including parental incompetence, sibling rivalry and rejection can also be factors. Health and social issues, too, can cast long shadows.
Psychobiography is sometimes seen as a ‘backwater’ in psychology but an area of interesting ideas and insights. It suggests as well as all those pretty tests and clever interview questions an understanding of an individual’s ‘life-story’ may be an important guide to their management style and success as a leader.
We are, in short, not victims of our past, but products of our past. Some argue that in life we learn much more from failure than success, although this may be a serious oversimplification.
› The persistence of presenteeism and other nuanced nonsense
› A new age of vulnerability: why inclusive leadership matters more than ever
› Ask yourself: "How do I make my employees feel?"
› Finance and the Diversity Dividend
For more information or to request interviews, contact CMI's Press Team on 020 7421 2705 or email press.office@managers.org.uk
› The 5 Greatest Examples of Change Management in Business History
› Four companies that failed spectacularly, and the lessons of their premature demise
› 6 companies that get employee engagement – and what they do right
› 4 Signs That Racism May Be An Issue In Your Workplace
› How to build an Effective Team: focus on just 3 things