From apprenticeships and qualifications to professional development and employability skills. Supporting learners, partners, and centres with tools to deliver, assess, and grow.
Join a professional community committed to excellence in management and leadership. Access exclusive resources, and recognition pathways including Chartered Manager.
Connect, celebrate, and lead with CMI’s vibrant community. From events and awards to networks and campaigns, get involved and help shape the future of management.
Stay informed with expert insights, thought leadership, and the latest in management. From in-depth features to practical guidance, explore the ideas shaping today’s workplace.
Learn about CMI’s mission, values, and impact. From our Royal Charter to governance, careers, and sustainability commitments, discover who we are and what drives us.
28 July 2015 -
Jermaine Haughton
As Chris Froome crossed the finishing line in Paris on Sunday evening, he became the only Briton to win the Tour de France twice. It was also the third victory in four years for Team Sky, having won the event in 2012 (Sir Bradley Wiggins) and 2013 (Froome).
Much like the proverbial London buses, having waited 99 years for one Tour victory, three have come in quick succession. Previously, Britain’s dominance was confined to the velodrome – with the track cyclists racking up vast amounts of Olympic medals over the past decade – making household names of Sir Chris Hoy and Victoria Pendleton, among others. Just what has changed?
Both successes have a common thread: Sir Dave Brailsford – previously performance director at British Cycling and now general manager at Team Sky – and his relentless commitment to the "marginal gains" philosophy.
Through the constant analysis of Big Data by sports scientists, the management theory aims to create incremental improvements across every area of a cyclist’s activity, including diet and lifestyle, provides the boost needed to win races.
“The whole principle came from the idea that if you broke down everything you could think of an improved it by 1% and put it back together again you will get a significant increase,” explained Sir Dave.
“There’s fitness and conditioning but there are other things that might seem on the periphery like sleeping in the right position, having the same pillow when you are going away and training in different places, hygiene. They’re tiny things but if you clump them all together it makes a big difference.”
The principle has been translated to other sports, such as football and athletics, as well as the business world with numerous examples of success.
Data analysis company QuantumBlack consulted a large engineering multinational to introduce a series of small adjustments to its team composition, that were mostly in the 0.5%-to-1% improvement range. The process resulted in a 22% rise in productivity improvement and performance.
Similarly, Toyota has used a variation of the marginal gains principle by allowing its own employees to stop the production line and make ongoing improvements to its products. The “kaizen” method is also commonly used by many other big and small Japanese firms, such as Sony.
Bosses must be mindful that in some cases the impact of making a series of small changes to products, can almost be as disruptive to customers as large makeovers.
Although Facebook's experiment to change the sentiment of user pages only had a less than 0.1% effect on posting behaviour by members, the improvements caused some short-term uproar with users posting their dissatisfaction for the changes online.
During the week-long secret test of almost 700,000 Facebook users in January 2012, the social network found users were more likely to post positive content if they were shown happy words, while they were more prone to project negative thoughts if they were shown content that was sadder than average.
As Facebook researchers explained, "given the massive scale of social networks such as Facebook, even small effects can have large aggregated consequences"
Steve Jones, Global Lead for Master Data Management at Capgemini, explains that businesses must be mindful of being over-reliant on big data analysis in determining marginal gains as it can create more questions than solutions.
“There is no silver bullet. Regardless of the hype, there is rarely a single answer that explains why product X isn’t selling, or a way to predict with complete accuracy how a particular stock will perform,” said Jones. “Big Data cannot predict the future. In fact, the bigger the quantity of data, the more questions it can create.”
“But behind the software vendor hype lies a fundamental shift in the way businesses are using information,” he added. “A shift from simple questions and answers towards a stream of marginal improvements that together add up to significant gains, even in a complex business environment. Expanding pools of data, from an increasing range of different sources, offer organisations the opportunity to identify fresh perspective – a new way of tackling an old problem. This different standpoint is the platform on which marginal gains are built.”
Inspired by Olaf Swantee, chief executive officer of telecommunications giant EE, here are the four key steps to successfully implementing marginal gains strategy to your company:
Images courtesy of Radu Razvan, Mitch Gunn & OmniArt via Shutterstock
› The persistence of presenteeism and other nuanced nonsense
› A new age of vulnerability: why inclusive leadership matters more than ever
› Ask yourself: "How do I make my employees feel?"
› Finance and the Diversity Dividend
For more information or to request interviews, contact CMI's Press Team on 020 7421 2705 or email press.office@managers.org.uk
› The 5 Greatest Examples of Change Management in Business History
› Four companies that failed spectacularly, and the lessons of their premature demise
› 6 companies that get employee engagement – and what they do right
› 4 Signs That Racism May Be An Issue In Your Workplace
› How to build an Effective Team: focus on just 3 things