From apprenticeships and qualifications to professional development and employability skills. Supporting learners, partners, and centres with tools to deliver, assess, and grow.
Join a professional community committed to excellence in management and leadership. Access exclusive resources, and recognition pathways including Chartered Manager.
Connect, celebrate, and lead with CMI’s vibrant community. From events and awards to networks and campaigns, get involved and help shape the future of management.
Stay informed with expert insights, thought leadership, and the latest in management. From in-depth features to practical guidance, explore the ideas shaping today’s workplace.
Learn about CMI’s mission, values, and impact. From our Royal Charter to governance, careers, and sustainability commitments, discover who we are and what drives us.
11 May 2016 -
With the UK’s productivity languishing, the last thing any organisation needs is an under-performing employee.
It’s tempting to dispense with the services of an under-performing staff member, but your organisation could find itself in serious legal trouble if the process is not handled in the correct way. Get it wrong, and you could be facing sizeable fines and compensation payments.
“The key question is whether an employee has a physical or mental impairment that is seen to be substantial and has a long-term, adverse effect on their ability to carry out normal duties,” says Chaman Salhan, CEO of law firm 2ndOpinionNow. “That comes under the Equality Act 2010.”
The nub of the Equality Act is that organisations cannot treat an individual differently because of a disability that impacts on the way they perform their role or duties within the company, and lasts, or is expected to last, for 12 months or longer.
To the untrained eye, many disabilities may not be immediately noticeable, so managers must be aware of all the circumstances that could lead to a disability being covered by the Equality Act.
“You often think of a physical disability or a mental disability, where there are severe problems, such as schizophrenia or Asperger’s,” says Salhan. “You don’t think of it as someone who has been working with you for a long time and all of a sudden keeps taking time off.”
Impairments caused by a disability could include a chronic back problem that prevents an employee coming to work or performing their duties – or even post-traumatic stress disorder as the result of a traumatic event.
The Equality Act does not just apply to ending an employee’s employment early; it also covers any unfavourable treatment in the workplace that arises because of an employee’s disability. This could include being overlooked for a promotion or denied training, or missing out on a bonus.
In the case of an employee being off sick because of a disability, managers need to demonstrate that any action taken was not influenced by the employee’s time off work.
“The test is: has there been unfavourable treatment against the employee?” Salhan says. “The fact that they have been ill would have meant they weren’t at work. The illness has caused them to be away and then caused the unfavourable treatment.
“In that case, a healthy person not attending work would have received the same treatment, but that is irrelevant. The reason they were away was because they had this disability and therefore that would be seen as unfavourable treatment under the Equality Act.
“Companies need to be looking at these decisions through the lens of risk management. The way you control risk is by making it clear that the reason why there is a problem with the person advancing their career, being eligible for courses or being dismissed is due to poor performance.”
Managers must be trained to deal with this, says Salhan, and also understand how employment law works in terms of all forms of discrimination, such as racial, gender and age discrimination.
To help employees suffering from impairments in the workplace, organisations are required to perform ‘reasonable adjustments’ to working practices, such as installing workplace aids or introducing flexible working arrangements.
To ascertain whether an adjustment is reasonable, companies must assess four key factors:
1. The financial and other costs of implementing the changes
2. The extent of any disruption to the way the business operates
3. The employer’s financial and other resources
4. The type and size of the employer
“Ultimately, it is going to depend on the circumstances of the individual and the individual organisation,” says Salhan. “One-size-fits-all doesn’t apply here. If you’re in a situation where you’ve got something of this nature, you need to make sure you have the right people in place to deal with it.”
The default position is to call upon the poor HR department but, in such a nuanced legal area, HR professionals are often not qualified.
”Lots of businesses rely on HR departments, but they are not lawyers,” says Salhan. “You may think it’s cheaper to use the HR department, but if you find yourself with a real problem, it could be far more expensive in the long term.”
This sponsored feature was first published in the spring edition of Professional Manager
If your organisation has concerns about discrimination, contact Chaman Salhan for an introductory discussion on 020 7936 3177 or visit 2ndopinionnow.co.uk
› The persistence of presenteeism and other nuanced nonsense
› A new age of vulnerability: why inclusive leadership matters more than ever
› Ask yourself: "How do I make my employees feel?"
› Finance and the Diversity Dividend
For more information or to request interviews, contact CMI's Press Team on 020 7421 2705 or email press.office@managers.org.uk
› The 5 Greatest Examples of Change Management in Business History
› Four companies that failed spectacularly, and the lessons of their premature demise
› 6 companies that get employee engagement – and what they do right
› 4 Signs That Racism May Be An Issue In Your Workplace
› How to build an Effective Team: focus on just 3 things