From apprenticeships and qualifications to professional development and employability skills. Supporting learners, partners, and centres with tools to deliver, assess, and grow.
Join a professional community committed to excellence in management and leadership. Access exclusive resources, and recognition pathways including Chartered Manager.
Connect, celebrate, and lead with CMI’s vibrant community. From events and awards to networks and campaigns, get involved and help shape the future of management.
Stay informed with expert insights, thought leadership, and the latest in management. From in-depth features to practical guidance, explore the ideas shaping today’s workplace.
Learn about CMI’s mission, values, and impact. From our Royal Charter to governance, careers, and sustainability commitments, discover who we are and what drives us.
03 November 2011 -
Kristina felt sexually harassed by the inappropriate advances of a colleague – and an investigation was triggered…
A Yorkshire firm received a resignation from a female employee, Kristina. As part of her resignation Kristina made the company aware that she had felt sexually harassed by her colleague, Steven, who she felt was pressuring her with constant flirtation. The firm conducted an investigation – in the process of which the matter became the only topic of conversation, and the office was divided over who was right and who was wrong.
At last a conclusion was reached. Steven was found to be a general bully and lost his job. However, a vast amount of animosity had been stirred in the process and when he was not charged with sexual harassment there was a good deal of anger among staff members.
LESSON:
The investigation was handled cautiously, with the wise step of only admitting evidence found from two impartial sources. However, because the harassment had gone on for a while before management noticed, sides had already been taken. The problem should have been noticed sooner; external mediation would have done a good deal to mitigate the damage done once the matter came to light.
Larry, a lawyer, quit because he was alienated by his firm’s restrictive rules on office relationships
Larry was a solicitor working 60-hour weeks. He started a relationship with Dora, but they were each exhausted by constantly pretending they were “merely” colleagues while at work. In an interview published by Andrew and Nada Kakabadse as part of their book Intimacy, before he left Larry commented: “What is irritating and wastes time is what we have to do to conceal our relationship, pretend we are distant, not speak at work. And for what? People have relationships at work. As soon as I can leave, I will.”
Not only did the firm’s policy alienate employees, it also cost them as Larry and Dora chose to move away once their induction and training was complete.
Since romance will happen in the office, adopt a mature and supportive approach. If it occurs in an environment where information is sensitive one partner may need to move on. Otherwise, recognize love’s potential to engender loyalty to your company.
› The persistence of presenteeism and other nuanced nonsense
› A new age of vulnerability: why inclusive leadership matters more than ever
› Ask yourself: "How do I make my employees feel?"
› Finance and the Diversity Dividend
For more information or to request interviews, contact CMI's Press Team on 020 7421 2705 or email press.office@managers.org.uk
› The 5 Greatest Examples of Change Management in Business History
› Four companies that failed spectacularly, and the lessons of their premature demise
› 6 companies that get employee engagement – and what they do right
› 4 Signs That Racism May Be An Issue In Your Workplace
› How to build an Effective Team: focus on just 3 things