From apprenticeships and qualifications to professional development and employability skills. Supporting learners, partners, and centres with tools to deliver, assess, and grow.
Join a professional community committed to excellence in management and leadership. Access exclusive resources, and recognition pathways including Chartered Manager.
Connect, celebrate, and lead with CMI’s vibrant community. From events and awards to networks and campaigns, get involved and help shape the future of management.
Stay informed with expert insights, thought leadership, and the latest in management. From in-depth features to practical guidance, explore the ideas shaping today’s workplace.
Learn about CMI’s mission, values, and impact. From our Royal Charter to governance, careers, and sustainability commitments, discover who we are and what drives us.
31 October 2014 -
Will Edwards
Walmart – the US retailer with 11,000 stores in 27 countries – showed this week that no business, however big or established, is safe from a crisis in the media.
On Monday, one shopper found that Walmart’s website was selling fancy-dress outfits under a Halloween section entitled “fat girl costumes”. The togs – which also included vampire and saloon girl getup – seemed to be encouraging plus-size females to dress in various guises, although the section’s title was hardly endearing.
A rush of angry tweets flooded from members of the public, and before long the story was picked up by the likes of Time, CNN, the Daily Mail and BuzzFeed – ensuring that you’d know about the gaffe, even if you’d never set foot in a Walmart store.
Company spokesman Ravi Jariwala told BuzzFeed: “We first heard about it this morning – our teams immediately engaged, we’re working to remove it as soon as possible and make sure it never happens again.”
The webpage was deleted soon after and the following message was posted on Walmart’s Twitter feed: “This never should have been on our site. It is unacceptable and we apologize”. The company responded to many of the angry tweets, but some people felt it was insincere: many of the messages just seemed to have been copied and pasted from the original tweet.
Walmart did act reasonably fast, and apologised – but overall the response was considered a little robotic, and there’s still been no explanation for how the mistake actually happened. Thing like this could happen to any big retailer, but surely Walmart could employ a proofreader to double check content before it’s uploaded?
Will Edwards is managing director of media training consultancy Bluewood Training.
› The persistence of presenteeism and other nuanced nonsense
› A new age of vulnerability: why inclusive leadership matters more than ever
› Ask yourself: "How do I make my employees feel?"
› Finance and the Diversity Dividend
For more information or to request interviews, contact CMI's Press Team on 020 7421 2705 or email press.office@managers.org.uk
› The 5 Greatest Examples of Change Management in Business History
› Four companies that failed spectacularly, and the lessons of their premature demise
› 6 companies that get employee engagement – and what they do right
› 4 Signs That Racism May Be An Issue In Your Workplace
› How to build an Effective Team: focus on just 3 things